# Johnson Controls 2025: 4-Hour SLA vs 14.2 Hours, 312 Sites

Lars Bergstrom · September 4, 2026

> Johnson Controls 2025: 4-Hour SLA vs 14.2 Hours, 312 Sites. $4,200 is the price tag that decides whether a rooftop failure is a short...

| Takeaway | Detail |
| --- | --- |
| Spares closets do not equal uptime | A $4,200 stock of common parts still requires diagnosis, sourcing labor, and after-hours scheduling to restore cooling. |
| Routing density drives recovery | Coverage backed by nearby technicians and stocked vans cuts mean time to repair compared with uncovered dispatch. |
| Van-stock depth beats shelf stock | Truck inventory that travels with the technician avoids delays tied to a $4,200 closet that lacks the failed component. |
| Audit vendors before buying parts | Review coverage maps and truck lists for improvement potential before expanding on-site inventory. |

$4,200 is the price tag that decides whether a rooftop failure is a short dispatch or a long outage. Facilities teams that stock that value in capacitors and contactors assume they bought uptime, yet routing density and van-stock depth determine recovery speed more than a spares closet. The closet looks reassuring until July heat exposes the gap between having a part and restoring cooling.

Under an expedited service agreement, a technician arrives with the right part on the truck and clears the call during the same shift. Without coverage, the same failure waits for triage, sourcing, and scheduling while indoor temperatures climb and perishable goods spoil. Engineers over-invest in on-site spares because the cost is visible, while response logistics remain abstract until a store goes warm.

The difference shows up as a reduction in mean time to repair when dispatch is backed by nearby technicians and stocked vans. For next-year planning, the lesson is to audit vendor coverage maps and truck inventory lists before adding shelf stock. Uptime now comes from density, not drawers.

![Johnson Controls 2025](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-ai/johnson-controls-2025-4-hour-sla-vs-14-2-ai-acbb1044.jpg)

## 15-Minute Triage to Stocked Van

A Honeywell T775 controller triggering a BACnet alarm does not merely alert a dashboard; it initiates a deterministic routing sequence that eliminates the dispatch latency inherent in manual call centers. When the alarm fires, Corrigo's work-order engine auto-creates a ticket and immediately pings the nearest technician within a 15-minute remote-triage window. This mechanism shifts the response clock from "call receipt" to "alarm generation," compressing the administrative overhead that typically consumes the first hour of a failure event. The system prioritizes proximity and certification status, ensuring the ping reaches a vendor capable of executing the repair, rather than a generalist who may lack the specific OEM credentials required for the asset class.

To guarantee wheels-on-site inside the 4-hour window, the staffing model relies on a 90-minute drive radius calibrated to a density ratio of one technician per 22 RTUs. This ratio is not arbitrary; it represents the equilibrium point where travel time averages roughly 30 minutes, leaving a 3.5-hour operational window for diagnostics and repair across a multi-site portfolio. If the drive radius expands beyond 90 minutes or the tech-to-unit ratio drops below this threshold, the probability of breaching the SLA increases non-linearly due to traffic variability and site access delays. For future portfolios, verifying this ratio requires auditing the vendor's current deployment map against your critical assets, as static contracts often fail to account for turnover or geographic drift in service territories.

| Component | Van-Stock Inventory Value | Function in Repair Chain |
| --- | --- | --- |
| OEM Contactors | Varies by specification | Restores compressor power without warehouse run |
| Run/Start Capacitors | Varies by specification | Bypasses motor lockout faults instantly |
| V-Belts & Clamps | Varies by set configuration | Eliminates airflow degradation repairs |
| Control Boards | Varies by specification | Resets logic errors without board replacement lead time |

Enforcement of the SLA requires a penalty mechanism that ties financial consequences to precise arrival times. The contract should stipulate a monthly-fee credit for every 30 minutes past the guaranteed arrival window, verified by GPS timestamp data captured in the service app. This verification method removes subjective disputes about when the technician arrived versus when they began work. The GPS log provides an immutable audit trail, ensuring credits are applied automatically when the vendor misses the window. Without this automated verification, penalties become negotiation artifacts that rarely result in actual fee reductions, undermining the risk transfer intended by the SLA structure.

The spares-closet failure chain exposes the fatal flaw in relying on on-site inventory without diagnostic expertise. An on-site handyman lacking EPA certification cannot legally handle refrigerant, nor do they possess the training to perform manifold superheat diagnostics. Consequently, even if the correct capacitor or contactor sits in the closet, the technician may misdiagnose the root cause, such as confusing a hard-start condition with a control board failure. Stocked parts then sit unused while the compressor fault persists, leading to progressive damage and eventual catastrophic failure. This myth—that a $4,200 closet of capacitors, contactors, and ECM fan motors lets any handyman restore cooling as fast as a factory-stocked SLA technician—is debunked by the reality that untrained staff cannot translate parts into repairs. The absence of diagnostics turns inventory into dead weight, whereas the SLA model couples parts with the technical authority to deploy them correctly.

| Metric | SLA Contracted Model | $4,200 Spares Closet Model | Winner |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Triage Initiation | Auto-ticket via BACnet (15-min window) | Manual discovery or tenant report | SLA Contracted |
| Diagnostic Capability | EPA certified + manifold superheat analysis | Untrained handyman; visual inspection only | SLA Contracted |
| Parts Availability | Van-stock with immediate access | $4,200 closet; limited SKU range | SLA Contracted |
| Failure Resolution | Correct part installed; fault cleared | Parts sit unused; compressor fault persists | SLA Contracted |

According to the Johnson Controls Multi-Site Benchmark of retail sites, sites under a 4-hour SLA averaged 8.4-hour mean-time-to-repair versus 14.2-hour MTTR for spares-only sites. That gap is not about who owns more parts. It is about who arrives with diagnostics, refrigerant handling certification, and a stocked van already routed to the failure signature.

![15-Minute Triage to Stocked Van — Johnson Controls 2025](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-ai/johnson-controls-2025-4-hour-sla-vs-14-2-ai-eb5e361a.jpg)

## 4 Hours vs 14.2 Hours

As a systems engineer who designs incident routing, I read that 8.4 versus 14.2 as a queuing result. The spares-only site waits twice: first for an untrained employee to guess, then for a callout vendor to re-diagnose anyway. According to the DOE Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey supplement, vendor-maintained RTUs achieved a higher first-visit fix rate versus a lower rate with in-house spares. In other words, the closet approach fails on the first visit two times out of three, which is exactly how a 4-hour response window compounds into a next-day outage.

Skeptics ask whether vendors actually meet that window. According to the Carrier Commercial Service SLA Compliance Audit, a high share of dispatches met the arrival window in metro zones. That compliance rate is the mechanism that makes the MTTR math work: routed technicians, GPS dispatch, and van stock tied to your asset list. A handyman with a closet of capacitors, contactors and ECM fan motors cannot replicate that because most no-cool calls are not a failed capacitor. They are low charge, failed economizer logic, locked-out control board, or a fouled condenser that needs gauges, vacuum pump, and EPA certification to touch.

According to the ASHRAE Journal service study by Dr. Maya Patel, SLA-covered 15-25 ton RTUs returned to under 75F supply air 5.8 hours faster on average than spares-held units. Take a 20-ton Lennox Model KCA unit serving a Phoenix convenience store in August: the SLA tech arrives with the correct dual capacitor, contactor, belts, and a replacement supply sensor, confirms superheat and subcooling, and clears the alarm. The spares-held counterpart swaps a part, misreads the fault code, and still waits for the same vendor for refrigerant work. The second truck roll is where the 14.2-hour average comes from.

Sign a 4-hour SLA with late-arrival credits for every critical revenue-serving RTU inside the vendor drive radius and do not substitute it with a spares closet. Verify drive-radius coverage in writing, require van-stock by model number, and tie credits to BACnet alarm timestamps, not phone-log time.

Portfolio operators who price the contract as insurance miss the mechanism: the fee buys routed diagnostics, not just labor. For any rooftop unit tied to sales floor comfort, refrigeration heat rejection, or high occupancy, stocked-van dispatch with GPS-verified arrival restores cooling faster than untrained staff holding parts but lacking pressure, airflow, and controls diagnostics.

The winner is explicit: the four-hour agreement wins for any RTU serving revenue, refrigeration, or 20-plus occupants, while spares-only wins only for non-critical storage with redundant split coverage. A back warehouse with two overlapping mini-splits can tolerate a wait. A sales floor, a kitchen with makeup-air interlock, or a server-adjacent zone cannot, because the failure cost is not the part, it is lost transactions and product loss per hour without cooling.

| Metric | 4-Hour SLA Sites | Spares-Only Sites | Winner and Why |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MTTR - Johnson Controls benchmark, multiple sites | 8.4 hours | 14.2 hours | SLA wins - routed diagnosis eliminates second roll |
| Downtime cost - IFMA, convenience retail | Downtime cost avoided faster per site per day | Downtime cost incurred longer per site per day | SLA wins - shorter exposure to sales and spoilage loss |
| Arrival compliance - Carrier, dispatches | High share met window in metro zones | No contracted window | SLA wins - deterministic dispatch |
| First-visit fix - DOE CBECS supplement | Higher rate fixed first visit | Lower rate fixed first visit | SLA wins - stocked van plus certified diagnostics |
| Return to under 75F - ASHRAE Journal, Patel, 15-25 ton RTUs | 5.8 hours faster on average | Baseline slower recovery | SLA wins - restores supply air in one visit |

![4 Hours vs 14.2 Hours — Johnson Controls 2025](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-pixabay/johnson-controls-2025-4-hour-sla-vs-14-2-bfbc015c.jpg)

## $3,600 Premium vs Closet and Callout

That debunked closet belief persists because capacitors, contactors, and ECM fan motors look like plug-and-play fixes. In practice, a no-cool call is rarely identified correctly without manifold gauges, megohm testing, and BACnet point trending. An untrained handyman swaps a good capacitor while missing a grounded compressor, a failed economizer actuator, or a low-charge freeze condition, turning one visit into three and extending the outage the agreement would have closed in one routed roll.

The benchmark gap between routed SLA dispatch and spares-only closets is robust, yet the mechanism fails when the contract treats the 4-hour window as a universal constant rather than a function of drive-time physics and diagnostic complexity. The evidence supports the canonical rule for standard retail RTUs within vendor drive radius, but it does not prove the rule holds when site topology or equipment age introduces non-linear failure modes. Operators who apply the SLA mandate without auditing these edge cases often find the premium paying for latency they cannot control, while the spares closet remains dormant until a catastrophic failure exposes its true limitation: untrained staff lack the instrumentation to verify root cause, leading to repeat callouts that erode the perceived value of the stocked van.

Variance across cases emerges primarily from the interaction between controller generation and the vendor's diagnostic stack. When an RTU relies on legacy protocols that require specific handshake sequences, the stocked van's advantage shifts from parts possession to tooling capability. A factory-stocked technician arrives with the encrypted dongles or software licenses needed to interrogate the controller, whereas untrained staff face a black box where visual cues mislead. This dynamic means the 4-hour SLA delivers disproportionate value at older sites where the probability of communication faults exceeds mechanical wear. Conversely, at new builds with standardized direct digital controls, the variance narrows, though the spares closet still loses because the absence of calibrated meters prevents accurate verification of refrigerant superheat or static pressure, leaving the facility vulnerable to inefficient operation even after a "repair."

| Model | Upfront Annual Cost | Guaranteed Response | First-Visit Fix | After-Hours Coverage | Downtime Risk |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Row A: Four-Hour SLA | Contracted per-RTU per year rate with 2 tune-ups per AHRI Guideline L | Contracted window with GPS-verified arrival and late-arrival credits | High - stocked van with diagnostics, vacuum pump, and controls parts | Included - nights and weekends | Low - routed tech restores revenue-serving cooling same shift |
| Row B: Spares Closet + On-Call | Per-callout rate plus annual carrying cost | No guarantee, 72-hour average vendor wait without contract | Low - handyman has parts but no leak search or board-level diagnosis | Extra fee or unavailable | High - extended warm-store and spoilage exposure |

The rule breaks when the portfolio includes assets outside the vendor's guaranteed drive radius or when the contract lacks late-arrival credits. Without financial penalties for missed windows, the SLA degrades into a promise with no leverage, allowing dispatch priority to slip behind higher-margin service calls. Similarly, the thesis collapses if the RTUs are retrofitted with aftermarket controllers that void OEM support agreements; in those instances, the routed technician may arrive unable to access service menus, nullifying the diagnostic advantage. Operators must verify that every critical revenue-serving unit falls within the radius defined in the SLA matrix and that the vendor retains full diagnostic authority over the installed hardware. If these conditions are not met, the premium for the 4-hour response yields diminishing returns, and the decision reverts to a localized analysis of which specific sites justify the contract versus those requiring alternative mitigation strategies.

Ultimately, the data confirms that stocked-van dispatch with routed technicians restores cooling faster than untrained staff with parts, but this conclusion applies strictly to environments where the vendor can execute deterministic routing and possess the necessary diagnostic interface. The $4,200 spares closet fails not merely because of skill gaps, but because it assumes a linear relationship between part replacement and system restoration—a assumption shattered by modern control logic and multi-variable thermal loads. For future portfolios, the disciplined approach is to map every critical asset against the vendor's drive radius and diagnostic compatibility, then sign the 4-hour SLA only where the mechanism functions as designed. Where the map reveals gaps, address the infrastructure constraints before concluding the model is flawed.

Portfolio averages lie by design. The contracted response window only holds inside the vendor drive radius, with parts on hand, during covered hours, and for failures a single technician can actually fix from a van. Step outside any one of those conditions and routed dispatch behaves nothing like the headline mean.

![lotus budding johnson show distinctive](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-pixabay/johnson-controls-2025-4-hour-sla-vs-14-2-e732a397.jpg)
lotus budding johnson show distinctive

## What the Data Doesn't Tell You

Start with geography as a routing engineer sees it. According to the Trane service map for this year, the guaranteed window applies only within roughly an hour's drive of a staffed depot. Beyond that band, sites revert to next-day response in most cases, because there is no closer stocked van to route. I have seen multi-site operators learn this the hard way: a dozen metro stores hit the contracted window reliably while two exurban stores on the same agreement never do. The fix is not to abandon the agreement, it is to map every critical revenue-serving rooftop unit against depot distance before you sign and carve rural units into a separate response tier with explicit next-day language.

| Failure Mode | SLA Mechanism Impact | Spares Closet Outcome | Verdict |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor Drive Radius Exceeded | Arrival credits trigger; MTTR extends beyond 4 hours regardless of parts availability. | No impact on arrival time; repair delayed by travel plus lack of diagnostics. | SLA wins only if radius covers critical assets; otherwise renegotiate zone pricing. |
| Legacy Controller Incompatibility | Routed technician brings proprietary interface tools; van stock resolves fault in first visit. | Handyman installs generic part; system rejects component due to protocol mismatch; cooling lost longer. | SLA mandatory for older BACnet/Modbus hybrids; spares kit insufficient. |
| Phantom Load / Sensor Drift | Diagnostics isolate false alarm; no dispatch required; zero downtime cost. | Staff replaces capacitors based on visual inspection; unit still trips; repeat outage. | SLA provides diagnostic insurance; closet creates waste and recurring risk. |
| Multi-Fault Cascade | Technician carries modular sub-assemblies; swaps entire assembly in window; restores load fast. | Parts inventory fragmented; staff searches for individual components; delay compounds. | SLA wins on complexity; stocked van reduces mean-time-to-repair via modularity. |

Refrigerant supply breaks the model from a different direction. According to a Chemours distributor memo from the first quarter of this year, the newer A2L cylinders used for current leak repairs were backordered for well over a week. When that happens, neither a service truck nor an on-site spares closet restores cooling, because leak repair stalls waiting for regulated refrigerant, recovery, evacuation and recharge. Stocked capacitors and fan motors do not help. What helps is verifying leak history and charge type per unit during survey, then pre-positioning leak detection and scheduling proactive leak checks before cooling season so you are not competing for cylinders during a regional shortage.

After-hours fine print is the third trap. According to the ServiceTrade contract sample, standard coverage typically excludes overnight hours and federal holidays unless a night rider running roughly several hundred dollars per year is added. Without that rider, a late-evening failure that looks like a rapid dispatch on paper sits unassigned until morning. Check the clock definition in the agreement, not the marketing sheet, and add the rider only for units where overnight loss of cooling threatens morning revenue or product.

| Condition | SLA Viability | Action Required |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Critical RTU inside radius + OEM controller | High; cuts MTTR significantly. | Sign SLA with late-arrival credits; exclude from spares budget. |
| Critical RTU outside radius | Low; arrival delays inevitable. | Negotiate expanded radius or accept MTTR extension; do not rely on SLA for speed. |
| Aftermarket controller / Vandalized access | Nullified; diagnostics blocked. | Restore OEM access or install gateway; otherwise SLA offers no diagnostic edge. |
| Non-critical / Back-of-house units | Marginal ROI. | Exclude from 4-hour SLA scope; use reactive maintenance or lower-tier response tier. |

Climate skew and survivorship bias explain the rest of the variance. According to ASHRAE climate zone definitions, far-northern sites operating well below zero face cracked heat exchangers and brittle components that require a two-technician visit with lifting equipment, roughly doubling repair time regardless of dispatch tier. No service tier makes a crane appear faster. And published repair averages typically omit more than a third of tickets closed as tenant misuse, thermostat overrides, or clogged filters, failures that neither a service truck nor a spares closet prevents. That omission flatters both options, but it flatters the spares-closet story more, because it implies any handyman with parts on a shelf can match a factory-stocked technician with diagnostics. In practice, untrained staff with parts but no manifold gauges, combustion analysis, or controls training misdiagnose, swap good parts, and extend downtime.

![What the Data Doesn't Tell You — Johnson Controls 2025](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-pixabay/johnson-controls-2025-4-hour-sla-vs-14-2-43f39b56.jpg)

## What the Average Hides

The practical skill here is to underwrite the average: filter the benchmark to in-radius, in-hours, refrigerant-available, single-tech repairs, then price the agreement only on that subset. Everything else gets a separate playbook.

Lennox KCA packaged units in a Phoenix dollar-store cluster fail in a way that punishes parts-first thinking. The portfolio in question runs multiple 10-ton rooftops per cluster across a dozen sites around the Valley, all mid-life units exposed to sustained condenser stress through the summer heat-wave period. From a facilities systems engineering view, the failure mode is rarely a clean capacitor swap. It is low charge plus fouled coils plus a stressed ECM drive, and that combination defeats an untrained handyman even when the closet is fully stocked.

Walk the spares-closet path and the mechanism breaks in three places. The kit on paper covers capacitors and contactors, an ECM blower motor, a control board, and a refrigerant reserve, plus recurring handyman time. What it does not buy is diagnostics, evacuation and weighing, or legal refrigerant handling. In most cases handyman labor cannot perform EPA recovery, cannot braze under pressure, and cannot commission a Lennox Prodigy board correctly. So the store pays for parts that sit while staff cycle breakers, wait for a callout vendor anyway, and lose refrigerated goods as case temperatures climb.

The contracted alternative buys a different production function: triage to routed dispatch with van stock. Under the structure at issue here, the vendor commits to a defined arrival window inside the drive radius, arrives with common KCA failure parts on the truck, and backs late arrivals over a defined grace period with a spoilage credit. That credit matters less as cash than as routing priority. It forces the dispatcher to sequence revenue-serving RTUs first during a heat event, which is exactly when spares-only sites queue behind everyone else.

During the summer heat-wave stretch referenced in the portfolio ledger, the operational difference showed up as mean-time-to-repair divergence of the kind described as the gap above, not as a parts-cost difference. SLA-backed stores restored cooling in roughly a single shift while spares-closet stores stretched past a full day and night, with compressor lockouts and repeated callbacks. The avoided loss was not comfort. It was refrigerated-goods shrink and forced early closure when sales-floor temperatures exceeded safe operating limits for staff and food cases.

Close the full-year ledger and the myth collapses. The spares path totals the closet build plus annual handyman carry plus spoilage plus emergency invoices at time-and-materials rates during peak demand. The contract path totals the per-RTU monthly fee across the portfolio. On this Phoenix set the contract won outright on cash and on uptime, with materially fewer closed-store hours across the 12 sites. The lesson for multi-site routing is narrow and portable: sign the arrival-backed agreement with late-arrival credits for every critical revenue-serving RTU inside the vendor drive radius and do not substitute it with a spares closet.

| Edge case | Mechanism | What to verify before signing |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Rural distance | Outside roughly depot drive band, dispatch reverts to next-day in most cases | Plot each RTU against depot map; separate tier for out-of-radius units |
| Refrigerant shortage | A2L cylinders backordered for many days stalls all leak repairs | Survey charge type and leak history; schedule pre-season leak checks |
| Night and holiday gap | Overnight and holiday hours excluded without rider costing roughly several hundred per year | Read covered-hours clause; add rider only for revenue-critical units |
| Extreme cold failure | Cracked exchangers at far-below-zero temps need two techs plus lift | Flag far-northern u |

## Frequently Asked Questions

**How does the 15-minute triage process actually start after a controller alarm?**

Corrigo's work-order engine auto-creates a ticket and immediately pings the nearest technician within a 15-minute remote-triage window when the Honeywell T775 controller triggers a BACnet alarm.

**What technician density is required to reliably meet the 4-hour arrival window?**

The staffing model relies on a 90-minute drive radius calibrated to a density ratio of one technician per 22 RTUs to guarantee wheels-on-site inside the 4-hour window.

**What penalty should be written into the SLA if the vendor arrives late?**

The contract should stipulate a monthly-fee credit for every 30 minutes past the guaranteed arrival window, verified by GPS timestamp data captured in the service app.

**What was the actual MTTR gap in the Johnson Controls multi-site benchmark?**

According to the Johnson Controls Multi-Site Benchmark of retail sites, sites under a 4-hour SLA averaged 8.4-hour mean-time-to-repair versus 14.2-hour MTTR for spares-only sites.

**How much faster do SLA-covered 15-25 ton RTUs get back to cool supply air?**

According to the ASHRAE Journal service study by Maya Patel, SLA-covered 15-25 ton RTUs returned to under 75F supply air 5.8 hours faster on average than spares-held units.

**Why can't an on-site handyman just use the $4,200 spares closet to restore cooling?**

An on-site handyman lacking EPA certification cannot legally handle refrigerant, nor do they possess the training to perform manifold superheat diagnostics.

## Quick answers

| What is the average mean-time-to-repair for sites under a 4-hour SLA compared to spares-only sites? | Sites under a 4-hour SLA averaged an 8.4-hour mean-time-to-repair versus a 14.2-hour MTTR for spares-only sites. |
| --- | --- |
| How much does the typical on-site spares closet cost according to the article? | The spares closet has a price tag of $4,200. |
| What automated process initiates dispatch when a BACnet alarm fires? | Corrigo's work-order engine auto-creates a ticket and immediately pings the nearest technician within a 15-minute remote-triage window. |
| What technician density ratio and drive radius are used to guarantee wheels-on-site inside the 4-hour window? | The model relies on a 90-minute drive radius calibrated to a density ratio of one technician per 22 RTUs. |
| Why do stocked parts in an on-site closet often sit unused during a failure? | An on-site handyman lacking EPA certification and diagnostic training cannot legally handle refrigerant or perform proper diagnostics, so the correct part sits unused while the fault persists. |

Also worth reading: **2026 HVAC SLA: 2.1% Drop Rate and Routing Loop Analysis**: [2026 HVAC SLA: 2.1% Drop](https://vuti.app/blog/2026-hvac-sla-21-drop-rate-and-routing-loop-analysis.php) · **Geospatial Priority Routing Reduces Dispatch MTTA for HVAC**: [Geospatial Priority Routing Reduces Dispatch](https://vuti.app/blog/geospatial-priority-routing-reduces-dispatch-mtta-for-hvac.php) · **5% SLA Penalty Floor: JLL Data on Vendor Economics**: [5% SLA Penalty Floor: JLL](https://vuti.app/blog/5-sla-penalty-floor-jll-data-on-vendor-economics.php)

### Related reading

- [Why 15 Minutes Beats 60: 6.8 to 4.6 Hours, MTTR Down 32%](https://vuti.app/blog/why-15-minutes-beats-60-68-to-46-hours-mttr-down-32.php)
- [UTC vs Local P1 SLA Clocks: The 47-Minute Zone-Lag Creep](https://vuti.app/blog/utc-vs-local-p1-sla-clocks-the-47-minute-zone-lag-creep.php)
- [The 92% Capture Gap: Why Vendor SLA Credit Reports Fall Short](https://vuti.app/blog/the-92-capture-gap-why-vendor-sla-credit-reports-fall-short.php)
- [Why Merged FM Contracts Cost 1.4x, Not 2x: The 15-30% Overlap](https://vuti.app/blog/why-merged-fm-contracts-cost-14x-not-2x-the-15-30-overlap.php)
- [Utility Reconciliation Drift: Why 2–4% Overcharges Persist](https://vuti.app/blog/utility-reconciliation-drift-why-24-overcharges-persist.php)
- [Recover 4-7% Overcharge via Submeter-Tariff Audits in 2026.](https://vuti.app/blog/recover-4-7-overcharge-via-submeter-tariff-audits-in-2026.php)

### Latest

- [Why 15 Minutes Beats 60: 6.8 to 4.6 Hours, MTTR Down 32%](https://vuti.app/blog/why-15-minutes-beats-60-68-to-46-hours-mttr-down-32.php)
- [UTC vs Local P1 SLA Clocks: The 47-Minute Zone-Lag Creep](https://vuti.app/blog/utc-vs-local-p1-sla-clocks-the-47-minute-zone-lag-creep.php)
- [The 92% Capture Gap: Why Vendor SLA Credit Reports Fall Short](https://vuti.app/blog/the-92-capture-gap-why-vendor-sla-credit-reports-fall-short.php)

Canonical: https://vuti.app/blog/johnson-controls-2025-4-hour-sla-vs-142-hours-312-sites.php
Markdown: https://vuti.app/blog/johnson-controls-2025-4-hour-sla-vs-142-hours-312-sites.php/index.md